Skip to main content

A closer look: The Sudd Wetland (Part One)

 

Having explored both the Nile and Lake Chad Basins, this blog has focused on the hydro-political conflicts on an international scale. While many of these case studies feature heavily in the news and in academic discourses, it is pertinent that we do not ignore the local scale hydro-politic dynamics. The Sudd Wetland provides a perfect example of regional-scale conflicts over water resources, and how managing smaller scale wetlands like these can in turn alleviate water scarcity issues at a broader scale.

---

The Sudd Wetlands: An introduction

While wetlands are a common feature in all the Nile Basin countries, the Sudd is unique in that it is one of the most valuable and unique ecosystems on the planet. It is located in South Sudan, formed by the White Nile's Bahr al-Jabal section. Its width varies from 10 to 40km and spans over 650km long (Rebelo and McCartney, 2012). The Sudd is also the largest freshwater wetland in the Nile Basin, which stretches over 30,000km squared, with the lateral extent of seasonal flooding being highly variable, and depending on the seasonal conditions (Rebelo and McCartney, 2012). The wetland is so valuable that is a designated Ramsar site that houses endangered mammalian species, rich fish populations, and directly affects the livelihoods of over 1 million people (COEBS, 2021).  


View of the Sudd wetlands from the ISS, Jan 2021

Roughly 80% of the population in Sudan find their livelihoods in agriculture and accounts for about 40% of the country's GDP (Sullivan, 2010). 70% of agriculture in Sudan is rain-fed, and the rest is managed through traditional spate irrigation, khors, hand-dug canals, or via large-scale irrigation projects such as the Gezira project (Sullivan, 2010). Although Sudan has the largest-scale irrigation projects and methods, it is most certainly not the most efficient by any means. Water is life for Sudan. It has access to huge underground water reserves which stem from the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System (Quadri, 2017). The full extent of the Sudd wetland is extremely variable, ranging from 42,000 km squared in the dry season to 90,000 km squared in the rainy season (COEBS, 2021). However, with the effects of climate change, the region has seen massive and unprecedented levels of flooding which has been detrimental to the people living in the wetlands. These floods have also led to livestock losses which have sparked new conflicts. 



Rising tensions: The Jonglei Canal

During the 1970s, Egypt and Sudan began to construct the Jonglei Canal in order to increase the amount of water available within the already hotly contested Nile Basin, however this sparked fierce opposition, with potential sparks of violent conflict due to many local inhabitants fearing that they may lose access to opportunities provided by the wetlands (Ide, 2020). It was started in the mid-1950s but was soon halted in 1984 after significant civil conflict from the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA). It was supposed to divert water from the Bahr al Jabal above the Sudd to bypass the Sudd swamp, and carry white Nile waters directly to the main channel of the river. At least that was the plan. However, with the recent developments of the Nile crisis between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have reached a stalemate, and renewed interest has been shown by Egypt and Sudan in resuming the Jonglei Canal project as a means of providing an alternative water source in response to reduced flows from the GERD project. 

Next week's post will look to dive into how this project falls short, and provide some remedies to build towards more sustainable management of water resources in the Sudd Wetland - and beyond this the Nile River Basin.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A reflection on COP26: An African Perspective

I n light of the recent COP26 talk in Glasgow, I wanted to touch upon climate change, reflect on what African nations got out of these talks, and dissect what this may mean in the future.   With the 26th United Nations climate change conference (COP26) having come to a close, media surrounding it is slowly dissipating - a win for the organisers considering that it wasn't well-received by many, with popular opinions stating that it 'fell short'. Already the climate summit was downplayed by world leaders in the run-up to it, and part of the problem for this was that there was no major headline agreement planned to come out of this - this COP was about determining whether the Paris agreement of '1.5 degree' global warming was still attainable.  Photo depicting 2015, 3-day rain that displaced 0.3 million people in Malawi ( Ashley Cooper/Getty images ) Climate change issues are already projected to hit African countries the hardest despite being the continent least respo

Water at its boiling point: The cusp of conflict (Part One)

W ar? What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. - iconic lyrics from the song 'War' by African American soul musician Edwin Starr. Unfortunately, it's not quite the militaristic war that people fear but rather one of aquatic nature. Water wars in Africa is a complex topic, therefore this will be a two-part blog post. This week we will look to break it down into two sections: Why is water leading to conflict? What causes these conflicts to emerge? --- Why is water so important? 'Many of the wars of the 20th century were about oil but wars of the coming 21st century will be about water unless we change the way in which we manage it' as put by Ismail Sergalin ( 2009 ), the then vice-president of the World Bank. Water is not just a 'commodity' but is a cornerstone of life. Water shortages reduce food production, aggrandize poverty and can reduce the capacity of a state to govern. Agriculture is accountable for over 67% of the earth's total water withdrawal (

Africa's Ancient Battleground

C olonialism. A bad word. The British. Evil. Words that seem to be thrown about these days and synonymous with each other. Is this true? To an extent, but it seems the GERD conflict as highlighted in last week’s blog post does not paint colonialism in a great light. Tensions over the Nile date back centuries, with Egypt, initially attempting to gain control over the Nile in 1874, sparking the Ethio-Egyptian war ( Jesman, 1959 ). Following this agreements were signed in 1929 and 1959 between Egypt and Sudan, which gave Cairo near-complete control of the Nile ( Abdalla, 1971 ). Here lies the problem - these treaties were illegitimate to the existence of you guessed it - colonialism. During the 'Scramble for Africa' controlling the Nile resource was a major colonial goal for the British ( Tekuya, 2020 ).  Figure 1: Cartoon graphic depicting the 'Scramble for Africa ' The Nile Water treaties were agreements between the British and their colonial counterparts (Sudan, Kenya