Skip to main content

Africa's Ancient Battleground

Colonialism. A bad word. The British. Evil. Words that seem to be thrown about these days and synonymous with each other. Is this true? To an extent, but it seems the GERD conflict as highlighted in last week’s blog post does not paint colonialism in a great light. Tensions over the Nile date back centuries, with Egypt, initially attempting to gain control over the Nile in 1874, sparking the Ethio-Egyptian war (Jesman, 1959). Following this agreements were signed in 1929 and 1959 between Egypt and Sudan, which gave Cairo near-complete control of the Nile (Abdalla, 1971). Here lies the problem - these treaties were illegitimate to the existence of you guessed it - colonialism. During the 'Scramble for Africa' controlling the Nile resource was a major colonial goal for the British (Tekuya, 2020). 



The Nile Water treaties were agreements between the British and their colonial counterparts (Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania), with the rest of the riparian countries not being signatories to this. Exclusion, mistrust and hostility was the result of this in the following decades. It's fair to say the treaties Egypt are trying to refer to in response to the GERD dam are colonial relics of the past. Egypt and Sudan support these colonial laced treaties as it allows them to solidify their own status of power over the Nile resources - a hegemonic power dynamic within the river basin (Tawfik, 2016). However as Tawfik (2016) puts it, a new hydro-political order is emerging, and upstream riparian states are beginning to garner more power through adopting a common position in current negotiations for a new framework of governance of the Nile waters. 


The absence of a basin-wide common vision for the use and allocation of water resources within the Nile River has resulted in "unilateral actions and bilateral agreements rather than integrated action plans" (Hussein and Grandi, 2017) which has become destructive to the people who rely on the river. Even in present days, these hydro-political conflicts have deep colonial ties from the past, however recently these old precedents are becoming untangled. As upstream riparian countries band together to increase their share of water withdrawals from the Nile, with hydrological projects including the likes of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), the power dynamics within the basis are entering a new age. It is still unclear whether this shift in the balance will lead to greater cooperation of the Nile's resources, or simply an establishment of a new hegemonic power state.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Concluding thoughts: A hopeful future

As we come to the end of this blog series, I would like to reflect a little on the ideas that I have output over the past 8 weeks. We have tackled hydropolitics across transboundary rivers within the Nile and Chad Basins, addressing the conflicts surrounding water resources both on an international and regional scale. I have made my best attempt at picking away at the many complexities surrounding water politics, ranging from transboundary management of water sources to the potential manifestation of a water war. Although my blog has exhibited many melancholic examples and suggested that the future is bleak, that is very much not the case. We have seen how mega projects such as the GERD can exacerbate already existing tensions between countries, however, infrastructures like the GERD will prove to be vital in providing millions with water access across every state boundary along the Nile.  With new knowledge of the local hydrology systems within the wetlands and greater emphasis be...

A closer look: The Sudd Wetland (Part Two)

F ollowing on from last week's blog post , we will continue our analysis on the regional case study of the Sudd Wetland.  --- Jonglei Canal: Renewed hope or destined failure? With many observers of the media believing that Egypt has only two choices in regards to the filling and operating of the GERD: a military intervention with Ethiopia or an alternative water source, many eyes are turning to resort to the latter in a bid to avoid conflict ( Al-monitor, 2021 ). The situation looks dire. In the Sudd Wetland, much of the water used here is often wasted due to extremely inefficient irrigation techniques and downright destructive mechanised agricultural practices ( Sullivan, 2010 ). These mechanised agricultural practices have cascaded into causing deforestation, land erosion and salinization of waters. The country is blessed with water resources and yet has poor management of its resources. Water treatment for example is almost unheard of in the region and much of their water is be...

A closer look: The Sudd Wetland (Part One)

  H aving explored both the Nile and Lake Chad Basins, this blog has focused on the hydro-political conflicts on an international scale. While many of these case studies feature heavily in the news and in academic discourses, it is pertinent that we do not ignore the local scale hydro-politic dynamics. The Sudd Wetland provides a perfect example of regional-scale conflicts over water resources, and how managing smaller scale wetlands like these can in turn alleviate water  scarcity issues at a broader scale. --- The Sudd Wetlands: An introduction While wetlands are a common feature in all the Nile Basin countries, the Sudd is unique in that it is one of the most valuable and unique ecosystems on the planet. It is located in South Sudan, formed by the White Nile's Bahr al-Jabal section. Its width varies from 10 to 40km and spans over 650km long ( Rebelo and McCartney, 2012 ). The Sudd is also the largest freshwater wetland in the Nile Basin, which stretches over 30,000km square...